patch applied (haskell-prime-status): BangPatterns: probably
accept ==> undecided
g9ks157k at acme.softbase.org
Thu Apr 24 13:46:17 EDT 2008
Am Freitag, 18. April 2008 11:54 schrieb Sittampalam, Ganesh:
> Simon Peyton Jones wrote:
> > Not allowing infix functions on the LHS would be a notable simplification.
> This would significantly weaken a useful property of Haskell, that
> definitions and uses often share the same concrete syntax. It's very natural
> to be able to define things that way and it would be a real shame to lose it
> (and I think it would break a lot of existing code).
(f . g) x = f (g x) is really nice.
> > In any case, I've always thought this was weird:
> > Just x == Just y = x == y
> It takes a little getting used to, but I don't find it that weird.
More information about the Haskell-prime