<div class="gmail_quote">I recently read <a href="http://www.haskell.org/onlinereport/haskell2010/" target="_blank">http://www.haskell.org/onlinereport/haskell2010/</a> and noticed a few minor issues in Chapter 5.<br>Is it easy to correct them on that web page for future readers? If not, at least this may be useful for future reports.<br>
Apologies if these were known already.<br><br>Section 5.2, the first sentence of list item 5 says "The form “<span>module</span><span> M</span>” names the set of all entities that are in scope with both an unqualified name “<span>e</span>” and a
qualified name “<span>M.e</span>”."<br>It is not clear that "in scope" here really means "in scope and exported by module M".<br><br>Section 5.6.1 contains "These modules are <span>not </span>part of Haskell 98, and they cannot be imported separately."<br>
I suggest that the "98" be removed.<br>
</div>