<html xmlns:v="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:vml" xmlns:o="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:office" xmlns:w="urn:schemas-microsoft-com:office:word" xmlns:m="http://schemas.microsoft.com/office/2004/12/omml" xmlns="http://www.w3.org/TR/REC-html40">
<head>
<meta http-equiv="Content-Type" content="text/html; charset=us-ascii">
<meta name="Generator" content="Microsoft Word 14 (filtered medium)">
<style><!--
/* Font Definitions */
@font-face
        {font-family:Calibri;
        panose-1:2 15 5 2 2 2 4 3 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Tahoma;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
@font-face
        {font-family:Verdana;
        panose-1:2 11 6 4 3 5 4 4 2 4;}
/* Style Definitions */
p.MsoNormal, li.MsoNormal, div.MsoNormal
        {margin:0cm;
        margin-bottom:.0001pt;
        font-size:12.0pt;
        font-family:"Times New Roman","serif";}
a:link, span.MsoHyperlink
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:blue;
        text-decoration:underline;}
a:visited, span.MsoHyperlinkFollowed
        {mso-style-priority:99;
        color:purple;
        text-decoration:underline;}
span.EmailStyle17
        {mso-style-type:personal-reply;
        font-family:"Verdana","sans-serif";
        color:#1F497D;}
.MsoChpDefault
        {mso-style-type:export-only;
        font-size:10.0pt;
        font-family:"Calibri","sans-serif";
        mso-fareast-language:EN-US;}
@page WordSection1
        {size:612.0pt 792.0pt;
        margin:72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt 72.0pt;}
div.WordSection1
        {page:WordSection1;}
--></style><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapedefaults v:ext="edit" spidmax="1026" />
</xml><![endif]--><!--[if gte mso 9]><xml>
<o:shapelayout v:ext="edit">
<o:idmap v:ext="edit" data="1" />
</o:shapelayout></xml><![endif]-->
</head>
<body lang="EN-GB" link="blue" vlink="purple">
<div class="WordSection1">
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-left:36.0pt">I'd argue that it's not. Haskell hasn't had a release in years, and I think it's time to put a little pressure on the community.<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1F497D"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1F497D">The question is: who is &#8220;the community&#8221;?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1F497D"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1F497D">It&#8217;s fairly clear that the Haskell Prime process itself is languishing. The last message about the development process that I can find is
<a href="http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/haskell-prime/2011-January/003335.html">
this one from Malcolm Wallace</a>, in January 2011.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1F497D"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1F497D">But please don&#8217;t blame Malcolm or
<a href="http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/haskell-prime/wiki/Committee">the committee</a>.&nbsp; Developing new, well-specified changes to Haskell will only happen if there is a vigorous eco-system of folk who are prepared to devote the love and time to do it.&nbsp; There
 are plenty of people (myself among them) who would be delighted if there was a series of well-specified updates to the Haskell standard; but it is harder to assemble a group that is willing to move that process forward.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1F497D"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1F497D">Why not?&nbsp; I don&#8217;t think it&#8217;s laziness or selfishness; just look at how helpful people are on the mailing list.&nbsp; Rather, I am guessing that it&#8217;s a subconscious
 assessment of cost/benefit.&nbsp; The cost is certainly significant, and (unlike a quick email response on Haskell Cafe) takes place over months.&nbsp;
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1F497D"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1F497D">The benefit, for an individual, is harder to articulate.&nbsp;&nbsp; GHC defines a de-facto standard, simply by existing, and for many practical purposes that is good
 enough.&nbsp; However, GHC is (quite consciously) exploring stuff that may or may not ultimately turn out to be a good idea: it&#8217;s a laboratory, not an every-detail-thought-out product.&nbsp; [Though of course we try hard to be good enough for production use.]&nbsp; So there
 is real merit in having a group, not too closely coupled to GHC, that picks off the best ideas and embodies them in a language standard. &nbsp;&nbsp;But if for any one individual, GHC is &#8220;good enough&#8221;, then the benefits of a language standard may seem distant and diffuse.&nbsp;
<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1F497D"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1F497D">I don&#8217;t have a solution to this particular conundrum.&nbsp; As many of you will remember, the
<a href="http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/haskell-prime/wiki/Process">Haskell Prime process</a> was itself developed in response to a sense that making a &#8220;big iteration&#8221; of the language was so large a task that no one felt able to even begin it.&nbsp; Hence the deliberately
 more incremental nature of Haskell Prime; but even this lighter-weight process is rather stuck.<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1F497D"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1F497D">I&#8217;m sure that any solution will involve (as it did in earlier stages) motivated individuals who are willing to take up leadership roles in developing Haskell&#8217;s
 language definition.&nbsp; I&#8217;m copying this to the main Haskell list, in the hope of attracting volunteers!<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1F497D"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1F497D">Simon<o:p></o:p></span></p>
<p class="MsoNormal"><span style="font-size:11.0pt;font-family:&quot;Verdana&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;;color:#1F497D"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></span></p>
<div style="border:none;border-left:solid blue 1.5pt;padding:0cm 0cm 0cm 4.0pt">
<div>
<div style="border:none;border-top:solid #B5C4DF 1.0pt;padding:3.0pt 0cm 0cm 0cm">
<p class="MsoNormal"><b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:&quot;Tahoma&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;">From:</span></b><span lang="EN-US" style="font-size:10.0pt;font-family:&quot;Tahoma&quot;,&quot;sans-serif&quot;"> haskell-prime-bounces@haskell.org [mailto:haskell-prime-bounces@haskell.org]
<b>On Behalf Of </b>Nate Soares<br>
<b>Sent:</b> 27 November 2012 22:44<br>
<b>To:</b> Ben Millwood<br>
<b>Cc:</b> haskell-prime@haskell.org Prime<br>
<b>Subject:</b> Re: Status of Haskell'?<o:p></o:p></span></p>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">&gt; it might be wise to see what GHC decides to do on that front, first,<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">I'd argue that it's not. Haskell hasn't had a release in years, and I think it's time to put a little pressure on the community.<o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal" style="margin-bottom:12.0pt"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 2:15 PM, Ben Millwood &lt;<a href="mailto:haskell@benmachine.co.uk" target="_blank">haskell@benmachine.co.uk</a>&gt; wrote:<o:p></o:p></p>
<p class="MsoNormal">On Tue, Nov 27, 2012 at 5:35 PM, Ian Lynagh &lt;<a href="mailto:igloo@earth.li">igloo@earth.li</a>&gt; wrote:<br>
&gt; [...] adding DeriveDataTypeable<br>
&gt; hopefully wouldn't be too controversial [...]<br>
<br>
This is a little tricky since the Data class itself makes (essential,<br>
I think) use of Rank2Types. Typeable ought to be fine, but it might be<br>
wise to see what GHC decides to do on that front, first, e.g. whether<br>
it's going to autoderive all instances or forbid user instances or<br>
anything else similarly bold.<o:p></o:p></p>
<div>
<div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Haskell-prime mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Haskell-prime@haskell.org">Haskell-prime@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime" target="_blank">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell-prime</a><o:p></o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
<p class="MsoNormal"><o:p>&nbsp;</o:p></p>
</div>
</div>
</div>
</body>
</html>