type classes and generality
Tue, 10 Jul 2001 11:21:46 +1000
On 09-Jul-2001, Alexander V. Voinov <firstname.lastname@example.org> wrote:
> Hi All,
> Fergus Henderson wrote:
> > Ah, now I think I understand your problem. You want to `random' to
> > generate random numbers that span all the possible values of the type
> > within the range [0, 1], or at least a substantial subset, but the "Real"
> > class doesn't let you generate any numbers other than integers.
> > The above approach will give you random numbers from `random', but they
> > will only ever be 0 or 1, so maybe they are not as random as you needed! ;-)
> Each pseudorandom generator generates a countable sequence of values,
> which is isomorphic to a sequence of integers. In good old (Turbo)C we
> got something between 0 and MAXINT and then divided by (double)MAXINT.
> Can't _this_ be done in Haskell?
Sure, it can be done, but not on a value whose type is constrained only by
the "Real" class, because the "Real" class doesn't have any division operator!
Haskell's "/" operator is a member of the "Floating" class, and "Floating"
is not a base class of "Real". It is a base class of the "RealFrac"
class, so you could use that approach for "RealFrac"... but the original
poster was asking for the solution to a more difficult problem.
Fergus Henderson <email@example.com> | "I have always known that the pursuit
The University of Melbourne | of excellence is a lethal habit"
WWW: <http://www.cs.mu.oz.au/~fjh> | -- the last words of T. S. Garp.