FW: Haskell 98 report
Tue, 12 Feb 2002 12:00:25 +1300
Simon Peyton-Jones writes:
| I propose to adopt Olaf's suggestion here.
| -----Original Message-----
| From: Olaf Chitil [mailto:firstname.lastname@example.org]
| To resolve this ambiguity of the report I suggest to add the sentence:
| However, all derived comparisons are strict in all arguments.
How about these adjustments to the wording?
"comparisons" -> "Eq and Ord class methods",
to cover min and max, which are slightly more than just
"all arguments" -> "both arguments",
because I initially misunderstood it as "all arguments of both
constructors" and started fretting that it would break existing