[Haskell] Re: sizeFM type
ketil+haskell at ii.uib.no
Mon Apr 26 23:09:18 EDT 2004
"Serge D. Mechveliani" <mechvel at botik.ru> writes:
> Alexander is right.
> Also as Integer has more sense than Int,
> I would suggest for the future standard Haskell library to have
> Integer as default. For example:
> length :: [a] -> Integer
> smallLength :: [a] -> Int
Hmm...isn't it possible to use a class here? Perhaps even Num?
class Num a where ....
length :: [b] -> a
If I haven't seen further, it is by standing in the footprints of giants
More information about the Haskell