[Haskell] Re: [Haskell-cafe] Why functional programming matters
kid.meier at gmail.com
Fri Jan 25 08:22:14 EST 2008
Yaakov Nemoy wrote:
> I'm still very much a newbie, but the one thing that struck me as the
> best feature coming from Python is the static typing. Changing the
> type of a function in Python will lead to strange runtime errors that
> take some work to debug, whereas, when I tinker with a program in
> Haskell, I already know it will work once it compiles.
I'm quite new to Haskell as well and I must echo this sentiment. The
mainstream has somewhat realized that its a waste of time to tell the
compiler the type of _everything_. Learning Haskell has completely
reversed my feeling that static typing is an old outdated idea. The
power of Haskell's type system makes it feel like you are programming in
a dynamic language to some degree, yet all of it is type-checked, and
that is just *really* cool.
Honestly, when I first started reading a Haskell tutorial I was
convinced that it was an runtime-typed language like Python. When the
tutorial moved on to explain that it is statically typed I could barely
The second thing I might want to highlight is the power of monads and
other techniques like arrows and FRP.
Granted, these are not easy concepts to impart in a talk, but I think
they were really an important discovery in FP as they deal with the
"problem" of IO in such a beautifully orthogonal way. Following on that,
more advanced structures like arrows and how all of this can contribute
to really powerful DSLs I think is a pretty big selling point.
Actually, come to think of it, one great way to show off the language is
to show off the power of some of the libraries that have been written.
For example, show how easily a parser can be created w/ Parsec; or show
an example of FRP w/ Yampa. These examples will likely tantalize the
programmers in the audience to want to learn more.
More information about the Haskell