<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Jun 11, 2009 at 9:56 AM, Sven Panne <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:Sven.Panne@aedion.de">Sven.Panne@aedion.de</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="border-left: 1px solid rgb(204, 204, 204); margin: 0pt 0pt 0pt 0.8ex; padding-left: 1ex;">
<br>
Any feedback is highly appreciated.<br>
</blockquote><div><br>Sinc<span style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;">e t</span><font style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;" size="2">his is a new package, is there<font size="2"> any possibility that the naming could be more economical?</font></font><br>
<br>Graphics.Rendering.OpenGL.GL.CoordTrans<font style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;" face="arial,helvetica,sans-serif" size="2"> is awfully long.<br><br>I think that "</font><font style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;" size="2">Graphics.Rendering.</font><font style="font-family: arial,helvetica,sans-serif;" size="2">" is clutter, and "OpenGL.GL." seems redundant to me. I'd very much like to encourage the idea that tremendously long package names ought to be considered poor form.</font><br>
</div></div>