<div>Yeah, two heads think better than one.</div><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">2009/9/6 Brent Yorgey <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:byorgey@seas.upenn.edu">byorgey@seas.upenn.edu</a>></span><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On Sat, Sep 05, 2009 at 08:31:18PM -0400, Albert Y. C. Lai wrote:<br>
> carlos gomez wrote:<br>
>> I'm interested too. Is there any place for one more ?<br>
><br>
> If we have two editors (let's say), we can set up a redundantly highly<br>
> available roster:<br>
><br>
> * usually they take turns to release issues<br>
> * but they have a way to arrange "I'm unavailable this weekend, please do<br>
> this weekend for me, in exchange of..."<br>
> * if one resigns, we still have the other to keep going for a few weeks,<br>
> during which we have time to find one more editor and restore the<br>
> redundancy.<br>
<br>
</div>Sure, this could be a good idea. But I will leave it up to the new<br>
editor to decide.<br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
-Brent<br>
</font><div><div></div><div class="h5">_______________________________________________<br>
Haskell mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Haskell@haskell.org">Haskell@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell" target="_blank">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/haskell</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>