[HOpenGL] EXT_framebuffer_object support.
coreyoconnor at gmail.com
Wed Dec 17 16:12:03 EST 2008
On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 11:12 AM, Balazs Komuves <bkomuves at gmail.com> wrote:
> I think we should have some testing and code review before trying to merge
> it with the
> official repository (there is a reason I did not publicised this before,
> though the FBO stuff
> is fairly new). For example I just discovered two (very minor) bugs by
> trying to generate
> Haddock documentation. The API isn't set into stone either; I hope it's
> enough, but some changes may be beneficial.
Hm. I certainly agree that testing and API review is required for
release. However I'd prefer other developers to have easy access to
these patches through a main development repository than not. If API
stability is a concern with the main repository then I suggest having
two repositories: One for development and another for stable use.
> On Wed, Dec 17, 2008 at 6:58 PM, Corey O'Connor <coreyoconnor at gmail.com>
>> Excellent stuff! I like having the framebuffer texture functions check
>> the status as well. That's a handy addition.
>> So how do we get your patch into the mainline repo? I'd hate to have
>> another person duplicate the same work again.
>> Corey O'Connor
More information about the HOpenGL