DData

[Wolfgang Jeltsch]

Am Montag, 5. April 2004 13:56 schrieb Sven Panne:
> [...]

> I'm not sure about the module names, but simply DData as the root is not
> very nice. What about Data.DData? Something more descriptive would be even
> nicer, because the module names should describe the functionality, not the
> genesis of the modules. Using "DData" as the package name is fine.
> Suggestions welcome...

If I remember correctly, DData was intended to be the next-generation standard 
set of collection modules.  So, maybe, we should just name the modules 
Data.Map, Data.Seq, etc.  I think, it was already said that this should 
probably be done.  A problem is Data.Set but there may be a solution for 
this.

Since DData will not be one collection library beside others but *the* 
collection library, we should avoid the name "DData" as part of a module 
name.

> [...]

Wolfgang