URI handling code; proposed Network.URI replacement
simonmar at microsoft.com
Tue Feb 24 13:07:16 EST 2004
> I've completed the functionality of my proposed upgrade to
> though there are still a couple of issues that need to be
> resolved with the
> ongoing RFC2396bis work (none critical to the general
> functionality). This
> is still work-in-progress, but I'm airing it now to see if
> folks think it's
> an acceptable upgrade to the existing Network.URI module.
Sorry for not replying on this topic sooner.
I've taken a look at your replacement URI, and it looks great. The
Haddock markup needs a little cleanup, but the interface looks fine.
Since it's mostly backwards compatible, there's no issue with upgrading
it in place. (well, there's one small issue: it introduces a dependency
from the network package on the parsec package, but that's not a big
We'll arrange for CVS access so you can commit your new version to the
More information about the Libraries