ijones at syntaxpolice.org
Tue Apr 5 16:33:56 EDT 2005
Dominic Steinitz <dominic.steinitz at blueyonder.co.uk> writes:
> So I added
> Ghc-options: -fglasgow-exts
You might look at the Extensions field to see if your exstension is
explicitly listed there.
> to the cabal file. Now this module compiles but I still get the same error on
> a different module and I know -fglasgow-exts allows this to compile when I do
> it by hand.
It's perhaps because it's trying to build an executable at this point
and you didn't add that flag to the executables. I take it that the
executables depend on the library?
> Why is cabal recompiling sources and why am I getting errors on the second
Executables that depend on their own libraries are slightly awkward
right now; we hope to improve support for that in the future. For
now, you should add that flag to both executables. You should also
list the depended-upon modules to the other-modules field for that
> The sources and the cabal file are available via:
I couldn't build it because I don't have the NewBinary package.
More information about the Libraries