Proposal: Adding Kleisli composition to Control.Monad
ndmitchell at gmail.com
Mon Nov 13 18:01:54 EST 2006
> > forever even has a different type than repeatM_. More reason to have
> > both.
> Is anyone else feeling uncomfortably crowded by the current namespace
> exported by the haskell libraries?
I think a good naming criteria is "could anyone have a function
defined with this name which _didn't_ do exactly what this one does".
For example, repeatM_ - can anyone think of an alternative definition
which didn't do the obvious thing? However forever could have loads of
More information about the Libraries