duncan.coutts at worc.ox.ac.uk
Fri Nov 24 07:25:29 EST 2006
On Fri, 2006-11-24 at 13:00 +0100, Sven Panne wrote:
> Am Freitag, 24. November 2006 12:23 schrieb Duncan Coutts:
> > [...]
> > Um, no it isn't. fps 0.9 is completely API compatible with the current
> > version. It's a performance upgrade only. We are not breaking API.
> > We knew this when we had it included in base, so we trimmed the API down
> > to make it supportable. We have no problem following the rules.
> If this is the case, there is no reason to *not* include fps 0.9 in "base" for
Yes, this was our original plan.
> If we all agree that it would be better to have it somewhere else, we
> can do this for 6.8.
More information about the Libraries