Long-term success of Cabal configurations? (was: Stability vs latest features)

[Bulat Ziganshin]

Hello Stefan,

Thursday, August 16, 2007, 11:43:57 PM, you wrote:

>>   build-depends: base >= 2.0, filepath, {- ... -}
>>   exposed-modules: Data.ByteString*, System.FilePath*, {- ... -}

> Hmm, good point.  I like it.  (I do think it would work much better if
> Cabal had a better notion of version numbers that includes forward
> compatibility and suchlike - don't ever satisfy a 1.0.0 request with
> 2.x.y, etc)...

base >=1.0.0, base < 2.0.0

or something like this should work



-- 
Best regards,
 Bulat                            mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin at gmail.com