Proposal: Add Compositor class as superclass of Arrow
ashley at semantic.org
Fri Oct 19 04:48:18 EDT 2007
Philippa Cowderoy wrote:
> The other way round (first but not arr) is arguably more useful - it's the
> class of embedded first-order compositional languages and with a small
> amount of work we can even define applicative sugar akin to proc or do.
> There are all kinds of tasks that can be a big win for!
Could you write out the class? Is it the same as DeepArrow?
More information about the Libraries