[Haskell] ANNOUNCE: Haddock version 126.96.36.199
david.waern at gmail.com
Wed Feb 13 08:20:00 EST 2008
2008/2/13, Ross Paterson <ross at soi.city.ac.uk>:
> On Sun, Feb 10, 2008 at 10:35:28PM +0100, David Waern wrote:
> > 2008/1/23, David Waern <david.waern at gmail.com>:
> > > > > 2008/1/23, Ross Paterson <ross at soi.city.ac.uk>:
> > > > > > If I add the new-style attributes to the base package, it hides
> > > > > > modules in the documentation for base, but packages that depend
> on base
> > > > > > seem to generate links to locations in those hidden modules, e.g.
> > > > > > of IO point at GHC.IOBase.IO.
> > I've now fixed this issue - a patch is available in the darcs
> OK, that seems to be fine now.
> If you build the libraries in ghc-6.8.2 (with the added OPTIONS_HADDOCK
> pragmas) with haddock-2.1, Data-Array.html is almost empty. The
> old Haddock had problems with re-exports from another package:
> * re-exported functions/types/classes were just shown as hyperlinked
> names without docs (the docs aren't stored in the interface file)
> * re-exported modules weren't shown at all (no reason that I can think
> However the new haddock doesn't even show the re-exported names.
Oh, interesting. We should be able show the docs for re-exports, since
the new Haddock do store them in the interface files.
Thanks for the report,
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Libraries