Proposal: Add concatMapM function (#2042)
lemming at henning-thielemann.de
Tue Jan 29 13:50:35 EST 2008
On Tue, 29 Jan 2008, Bulat Ziganshin wrote:
> Hello Henning,
> Tuesday, January 29, 2008, 6:35:28 PM, you wrote:
> > In consider Bulat's point as preservation of unfavorable coding style
> > (namely unqualified anonymous import). This method does not scale well and
> > you can motivate stop of any development this way. So I object to Bulat's
> > argument, but not necessarily vote particularly for concatMapM, since I
> > didn't need it so far - which can also mean, that I have always
> > worked-around it without noticing it.
> so you will prefer to add it immediately to 6.8.*?
Why a GHC version? I thought that we speak about the 'base' package.
> i wonder how much code you write
enough each day
> and which tool you use.
NEdit. I use almost only qualified imports and named imports and have my
modules designed to be used in this way, write signatures for all
top-level variables and use -Wall.
> my tools can't automatically insert these imports and i don't have time
> to do this monkey work by hand - and anyway i consider as bad
> programming style trying to replace package manager with home-grown
More information about the Libraries