Thinking about what's missing in our library coverage

[Adam Wick]

On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 17:22 +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 08:05 -0700, Adam Wick wrote:
> > On Mon, 2009-08-10 at 13:45 +0100, Duncan Coutts wrote:
> > > It's clear that the licensing issue is going to be controversial and
> > > will take some time. I'm not sure it is sensible to try and work it out
> > > before the next major release,
> > If you're not going to work it out now, that means that any new packages
> > should assume the strictest possible restriction (BSD or equivalent
> > only), yes? It's a lot easier to add packages later than remove them.
> Yes, I noted:

Great!

-Adam