time library dependencies

[Simon Marlow]

On 03/06/2009 16:48, Ashley Yakeley wrote:
> On Wed, 2009-06-03 at 11:26 +0100, Simon Marlow wrote:
>> On 03/06/2009 08:33, Ashley Yakeley wrote:
>>> wren ng thornton wrote:
>>>> Yeah, orphan instances are bad.
>>> Why?
>>>
>>> I already use private orphan modules within the package, though the
>>> package does not externally expose any orphan instances.
>> How can you have private orphan instances?  The only "private" orphan
>> instances are those where the type or class is also private, is that
>> what you mean?
>
> I don't have any private orphan instances. However I have orphan modules

Sorry, misread "modules" as "instances"!

Cheers,
	Simon