ANNOUNCE: deepseq-1.0.0.0

[Sittampalam, Ganesh]

Yitzchak Gale wrote:
> Simon Marlow wrote:
>> So then what shall we call the a -> () version?
>> One possibility is to go back to calling it rnf.
> 
> In light of apfelmus' comment, I vote for rnf.
> 
> And in that case, how about the analogous alternative for seq itself:
> 
> hnf :: a -> ()

I think it would be whnf since it doesn't evaluate under lambdas.

I also vote for rnf, because we should have a good reason for changing
names of things.

Ganesh

=============================================================================== 
 Please access the attached hyperlink for an important electronic communications disclaimer: 
 http://www.credit-suisse.com/legal/en/disclaimer_email_ib.html 
 ===============================================================================