ANNOUNCE: deepseq-1.0.0.0

[Bulat Ziganshin]

Hello Simon,

Thursday, November 19, 2009, 2:36:12 PM, you wrote:

> The main question still to be resolved is what names to use.  I agree
> with Duncan's point that deepseq should have the same type as seq, to 
> reduce confusion.  So then what shall we call the a -> () version?

not that i vote for it, just idea: deepseq_

like monadic *_ functions


-- 
Best regards,
 Bulat                            mailto:Bulat.Ziganshin at gmail.com