Proposal #3339: Add (+>) as a synonym for mappend
fischer at nii.ac.jp
Mon Aug 15 09:21:44 CEST 2011
> This is a call for consensus. Do we agree to add
> infixr 6 <>
> Renaming return to pure would break lots of
> code. Adding <> doesn't have anywhere near the same implications.
It looks like Johan will soon be committing a disruptive change
> that will break many packages.
What are those many packages that will break?
> Is it necessary for the semigroups
> package to change the name of <> in order to make it
> possible to fix the broken packages in a reasonable way,
Why aren't proper imports (as mentioned earlier by Johan) enough to let both
versions of <> coexist?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Libraries