Removing lazy IO?
mail at joachim-breitner.de
Thu Nov 10 13:56:16 CET 2011
Am Donnerstag, den 10.11.2011, 12:36 +0000 schrieb Simon Marlow:
> It's not what we traditionally refer to as "lazy IO". It is lazy, but
> it is not injecting side-effects into pure compuations. You can tell
> that it isn't problematic by the fact that you can implement hPutStrLn
> yourself in terms of hPutChar, there's no ned for unsafeInterleaveIO.
> The problematic lazy I/O is really just hGetContents and getContents.
> So it's really just lazy I, not lazy I/O.
ah, got it. Thanks for the clarification!
Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
mail at joachim-breitner.de | nomeata at debian.org | GPG: 0x4743206C
xmpp: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de | http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
-------------- next part --------------
A non-text attachment was scrubbed...
Name: not available
Size: 198 bytes
Desc: This is a digitally signed message part
More information about the Libraries