Proposal: Remove Num superclass of Bits
ekmett at gmail.com
Mon Oct 17 19:12:41 CEST 2011
I have to admit this seems to be the most sensible solution, and avoids
stealing names that are more appropriate for numeric instances anyways.
On Mon, Oct 17, 2011 at 3:26 AM, Joachim Breitner
<mail at joachim-breitner.de>wrote:
> Am Samstag, den 15.10.2011, 17:41 -0700 schrieb John Meacham:
> > I would just remove the bit and testBit defalut instances, they seem
> > like reasonable primitives to be required for an instance.
> I agree. Bits is certainly not something that a Haskell Beginner would
> have to implement every day, but is more likely a task that requires
> lots of thought and well-written code anyway. Having to implement these
> two functions as well is not a large burden there.
> Joachim "nomeata" Breitner
> mail at joachim-breitner.de | nomeata at debian.org | GPG: 0x4743206C
> xmpp: nomeata at joachim-breitner.de | http://www.joachim-breitner.de/
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Libraries