Proposal: Remove Num superclass of Bits
johan.tibell at gmail.com
Sat Oct 29 19:22:20 CEST 2011
On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Bas van Dijk <v.dijk.bas at gmail.com> wrote:
> On 29 October 2011 18:25, Johan Tibell <johan.tibell at gmail.com> wrote:
> > No. Do we know which packages would break? I imagine that downloading the
> > hackage tarball and grepping for 'instance Bits' should tell you.
> Where can this tarball be downloaded?
"archive of just the latest versions of all the packages (230MB tar file)"
> > Also, does this have any performance impact?
> Performance should not be affected. After inlining all instances
> should use the same definitions.
Good. So none of the current instances use the default* functions?
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the Libraries