marlowsd at gmail.com
Tue Jul 3 15:33:40 CEST 2012
On 15/06/2012 10:39, Sjoerd Visscher wrote:
> On Fri, 15 Jun 2012 09:07:54 0100, Simon Marlow <marlowsd at gmail.com> wrote:
> > I still need to ponder the Applicative version, I'm not familiar with
>> Control.Newtype. I would still like the Traversable abstraction I
>> mentioned in my last message.
> Control.Newtype is not important. I added it just to be able to write
> ala' Concurrently traverse getURL urls
> instead of
> runConcurrently $ traverse (Concurrently . getURL) urls
> But it is probably nicer to have
> doConcurrently :: Traversable t => (a -> IO b) -> t a -> IO (t b)
> then you could write
> doConcurrently getURL urls
> and your doConcurrently would just be "doConcurrently id".
> I updated the code at https://gist.github.com/2926572
Thanks, I've incorporated your Concurrently type, and renamed
doConcurrently to mapConcurrently (by analogy with mapM).
I released async-188.8.131.52 with the latest round of changes:
Changes in 184.108.40.206:
Added a Functor instance for Async
Added asyncBound, asyncOn, asyncWithUnmask, asyncOnWithUnmask,
withAsyncBound, withAsyncOn, withAsyncWithUnmask, withAsyncOnWithUnmask.
Added Concurrently (with Applicative and Alternative instances)
More information about the Libraries