Proposal: Add (&) to Data.Function
jon.fairbairn at cl.cam.ac.uk
Fri Nov 23 11:37:03 CET 2012
Cale Gibbard <cgibbard at gmail.com> writes:
> On 22 November 2012 11:46, Johan Tibell <johan.tibell at gmail.com> wrote:
>> On Thursday, November 22, 2012, Joachim Breitner wrote:
>>> -1 for adding such an operator at all. Languages benefit from consistnet
>>> idiom; too many ways of doing the same thing are not always good.
>> -1 for me for the same reason. After looking at examples in this thread I
>> don't find that the loss in readability is worth it.
>> Also for beginners I don't want to explain yet another way to write function
> -1 for more or less the same reason.
And -1 from me for the same reason. The more ways there are of
writing the same thing, the more effort it takes to read them.
Jón Fairbairn Jon.Fairbairn at cl.cam.ac.uk
More information about the Libraries