suggestion: A common type class for mutable variables

Edward Kmett ekmett at gmail.com
Mon Jun 3 20:32:43 CEST 2013


I see little hope in standardizing as, heck, I personally have felt the
need to use two of the different points in the design space within just my
own code.

-Edward


On Mon, Jun 3, 2013 at 2:13 PM, harry <voldermort at hotmail.com> wrote:

> Henning Thielemann <lemming <at> henning-thielemann.de> writes:
>
> > I have started a Wiki page in order to keep an overview of all the
> > existing approaches:
> >    http://www.haskell.org/haskellwiki/Mutable_variable
>
> There seems to be a fair amount of duplication in all this ... any idea how
> a "standard" approach could be selected?
>
>
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20130603/3581e2a4/attachment.htm>


More information about the Libraries mailing list