[PATCH 1/3] Implement nand, nor, nany and nall in Data.List

Carter Schonwald carter.schonwald at gmail.com
Thu Feb 27 16:13:57 UTC 2014


Nexist

On Thursday, February 27, 2014, Alexander Berntsen <alexander at plaimi.net>
wrote:

> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNED MESSAGE-----
> Hash: SHA256
>
> On 27/02/14 16:44, Niklas Haas wrote:
> > In lens we have ‘none’ for what you call nany, which I find much
> > more readable and clear. I don't like ‘nall’ either but I don't
> > know a better term for it. nand/nor at least are in widespread use
> > outside of this patch, so I don't find them to be too confusing.
> I agree that `none' is more readable than `nany' (though I have seen
> `nany' used elsewhere). However, I couldn't think of a better name for
> `nall' -- and `nand' and `nor' are both very common nomenclature. As
> such, I just settled for consistency.
> - --
> Alexander
> alexander at plaimi.net <javascript:;>
> https://secure.plaimi.net/~alexander
> -----BEGIN PGP SIGNATURE-----
> Version: GnuPG v2.0.22 (GNU/Linux)
> Comment: Using GnuPG with Thunderbird - http://www.enigmail.net/
>
> iF4EAREIAAYFAlMPX+QACgkQRtClrXBQc7XvAQEAkGAn2Dw0WJMD24BPSJFLbB5r
> sQmrVc/+yWokEAc7LMQBAIQHnx+gWAFdjkD0R0nophjl4hm82vHPpkiyqWr0nDhN
> =wYoY
> -----END PGP SIGNATURE-----
> _______________________________________________
> Libraries mailing list
> Libraries at haskell.org <javascript:;>
> http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries
>
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
URL: <http://www.haskell.org/pipermail/libraries/attachments/20140227/40412730/attachment.html>


More information about the Libraries mailing list