On Wed, Nov 18, 2009 at 2:44 AM, Ganesh Sittampalam <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ganesh@earth.li">ganesh@earth.li</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On Tue, 17 Nov 2009, Edward Kmett wrote:<br>
<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
I guess the question is then, when should code start looking to changing<br>
their dependencies over to monads-tf and monads-fd?<br>
<br>
A cleanly demarked cut over would be useful to get us out of this limbo<br>
state that helps nobody.<br>
</blockquote>
<br></div>
Are you suggesting that we declare a date or on which people should make the switch? I think that might make some sense if we weren't already accidentally part way through it, but given that we are, I'd say the best option is to just do it asap once there is proper agreement.</blockquote>
<div><br></div><div>Substantively, I agree -- assuming that the issues that keep monads-tf and monads-fd from being loaded into the same program are fixed, so that library writers don't have to go through all of this again almost immediately.</div>
<div><br></div><div>-Edward Kmett</div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><font color="#888888"><br>
Ganesh</font><div><div></div><div class="h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Libraries mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Libraries@haskell.org" target="_blank">Libraries@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries" target="_blank">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div><br>