Tada! <a href="http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/4455">http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/ticket/4455</a><div><br></div><div>Thanks for the patch :)<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 6:35 PM, Bas van Dijk <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:v.dijk.bas@gmail.com">v.dijk.bas@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br>
<blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;"><div><div></div><div class="h5">On Fri, Oct 29, 2010 at 10:11 PM, Daniel Peebles <<a href="mailto:pumpkingod@gmail.com">pumpkingod@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> Hi all,<br>
> Strangely enough, ST has a Functor and a Monad instance, but no Applicative<br>
> instance (I guess it was pre-Applicative). I propose to add one. It doesn't<br>
> seem very controversial, but I guess a normal discussion period for these<br>
> proposals is two weeks?<br>
<br>
</div></div>+1<br>
<br>
Don't forget to make a ticket so this is nor forgotten:<br>
<br>
<a href="http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/newticket?type=proposal&component=libraries/base&milestone=Not+GHC" target="_blank">http://hackage.haskell.org/trac/ghc/newticket?type=proposal&component=libraries/base&milestone=Not+GHC</a><br>
<font color="#888888"><br>
Bas<br>
</font></blockquote></div><br></div>