<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Apr 5, 2011 at 1:38 AM, Ian Lynagh <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:igloo@earth.li">igloo@earth.li</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On Mon, Apr 04, 2011 at 06:26:10PM +0200, Lennart Kolmodin wrote:<br>
><br>
> I see that there is now a repo on github:<br>
> <a href="https://github.com/ghc/packages-binary" target="_blank">https://github.com/ghc/packages-binary</a><br>
> However, it's a completely different conversion from darcs than the one I<br>
> did earlier.<br>
><br>
> Please base the GHC copy of binary on the conversion I've already done, as<br>
> both Johan and I have done work in this repo. You won't be able to pull the<br>
> changes otherwise.<br>
<br>
</div>What's the best way to do that, given people already have the other repo<br>
checked out? i.e. can we do better than asking everyone to<br>
rm -rf libraries/binary<br>
./sync-all get<br>
?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div><br></div><div>I guess a hack would be to check for a commit hash id we know exists in your conversion of the repo, which won't exist in my copy of it.</div><div>If so, remove the repo and fetch again?</div>
<div><br></div><div>Lennart</div><div><br></div><div> </div></div>