<div class="gmail_quote">On Thu, Apr 28, 2011 at 9:08 PM, Luis Casillas <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:luis@casillas.org">luis@casillas.org</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<br>
2. Concern that Int-based indexing breaks the set abstraction by exposing a specific ordering (Trac comment by Malcolm Wallace). My assumption when I decided to submit this patch was that if it's OK for Data.Map to have these operations, then it should also be ok for Data.Set to have them.</blockquote>
<div><br></div><div>I agree with Malcolm on this point. The int-indexed functions on Map shouldn't be there in the first place, so I'd be unhappy to have them spread. Those modules already have disagreeably bloated APIs.</div>
</div>