On Sat, Oct 29, 2011 at 9:41 AM, Bas van Dijk <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:v.dijk.bas@gmail.com">v.dijk.bas@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><div class="gmail_quote"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im">On 29 October 2011 18:25, Johan Tibell <<a href="mailto:johan.tibell@gmail.com">johan.tibell@gmail.com</a>> wrote:<br>
> No. Do we know which packages would break? I imagine that downloading the<br>
> hackage tarball and grepping for 'instance Bits' should tell you.<br>
<br>
</div>Where can this tarball be downloaded?<br></blockquote><div><br></div><a href="http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/hackage.html">http://hackage.haskell.org/packages/hackage.html</a><br> <br>"archive of just the latest versions of all the packages (230MB tar file)"</div>
<div class="gmail_quote"><br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex;">
<div class="im"><br>
> Also, does this have any performance impact?<br>
<br>
</div>Performance should not be affected. After inlining all instances<br>
should use the same definitions.<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>Good. So none of the current instances use the default* functions?</div><div><br></div><div>-- Johan</div><div><br></div></div>