-1 as well<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Mon, Jul 2, 2012 at 1:17 PM, Bryan O'Sullivan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bos@serpentine.com" target="_blank">bos@serpentine.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="gmail_quote"><div class="im">On Fri, Jun 29, 2012 at 1:59 PM, Twan van Laarhoven <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:twanvl@gmail.com" target="_blank">twanvl@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br></div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<br>
I propose to change the functions digitToInt and intToDigit in Data.Char [...]<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>This seems like a very strange change to want to make.</div><div><br></div><div>It already surprised me that digitToInt accepted hex digits; having it accept digits in number bases that nobody uses seems like even less desirable behaviour.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Quite strongly against this.</div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Libraries mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Libraries@haskell.org">Libraries@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries" target="_blank">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>