+1<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Tue, Aug 14, 2012 at 1:27 PM, Bryan O'Sullivan <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:bos@serpentine.com" target="_blank">bos@serpentine.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On Mon, Aug 13, 2012 at 3:06 PM, Mark Lentczner <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mark.lentczner@gmail.com" target="_blank">mark.lentczner@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br></div><div class="gmail_quote">
<div class="im"><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div><br></div><div><b>If you are part of the reviewing process:</b> Traditionally, proposals have been accompanied by lengthly discussions, often resulting in deep API design confabs.</div></blockquote><div><br></div></div>
<div>
The discussion period for inclusion of vector in the HP has ended. I'd like to move that vector 0.9.1 be added to the next HP.</div></div>
<br>_______________________________________________<br>
Libraries mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Libraries@haskell.org">Libraries@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries" target="_blank">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries</a><br>
<br></blockquote></div><br>