<div dir="ltr"><br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On Fri, Oct 5, 2012 at 1:58 AM, Ross Paterson <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:ross@soi.city.ac.uk" target="_blank">ross@soi.city.ac.uk</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
<div class="im">On Thu, Oct 04, 2012 at 11:44:47PM +0100, Andreas Abel wrote:<br>
> I pulled the new 00-index.tar from hackage an hour ago with cabal<br>
> update, breaking cabal install.<br>
><br>
> cabal: Couldn't read cabal file "warp/1.3.3/warp.cabal"<br>
> cabal: Couldn't read cabal file "warp/<a href="http://1.3.3.1/warp.cabal" target="_blank">1.3.3.1/warp.cabal</a>"<br>
><br>
> Fix is<br>
><br>
> $ tar -f 00-index.tar --delete warp/1.3.3<br>
> $ tar -f 00-index.tar --delete warp/<a href="http://1.3.3.1" target="_blank">1.3.3.1</a><br>
><br>
> My system:<br>
><br>
> $ cabal --version<br>
> cabal-install version 0.10.2<br>
> using version 1.10.1.0 of the Cabal library<br>
> $ ghc --version<br>
> The Glorious Glasgow Haskell Compilation System, version 7.0.1<br>
><br>
> The cabal files for warp/<a href="http://1.3.3." target="_blank">1.3.3.</a>.. need a fix, or be removed from hackage.<br>
<br>
</div>Yet another test suite containing a conditional, which breaks<br>
cabal-install-0.10.2. Are these going to be rejected by the Cabal<br>
library, or should people stop using cabal-install-0.10.2?<br>
<div class="HOEnZb"><div class="h5"><br>
_______________________________________________<br>
Libraries mailing list<br>
<a href="mailto:Libraries@haskell.org">Libraries@haskell.org</a><br>
<a href="http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries" target="_blank">http://www.haskell.org/mailman/listinfo/libraries</a><br>
</div></div></blockquote></div> <div>If consensus is that we should still be dropping the conditionals from test-suite sections, I can send you updated cabal files for those two versions. I would just default to assuming a non-Windows system.</div>
<div><br></div><div>Michael</div></div>