[web-devel] [Yesod] getBy404.

[Felipe Almeida Lessa]

2010/12/20 Michael Snoyman <michael at snoyman.com>:
> * Should it be yesod-base or yesod-core?

yesod-core sounds better :).

> * Maybe we should leave it as yesod and create a new package called
> yesod-complete? (I don't particularly like this...)

Neither do I.

> * Should yesod-base have a plain Yesod module, or should that be in
> the yesod-complete package and export all the stuff (forms,
> persistent) that we have right now?

I think "Yesod" module should be in 'yesod' package.  See below.

> * And should we split the scaffolding tool into its own package as
> well? This probably depends a lot on which base (base or complete)
> ends up getting the plain "yesod" name.

I think it should be in 'yesod' package as well.  The scaffolding tool
prefers using libraries from the yesod ecosystem, so I can't see the
advantage of splitting it from 'yesod' package.

My 2¢.  Cheers!

-- 
Felipe.