<p>Sure, will do both.</p>
<p>How comprehensive should the header list be?</p>
<p><blockquote type="cite">Am 04.02.2011 11:05 schrieb "Michael Snoyman" <<a href="mailto:michael@snoyman.com">michael@snoyman.com</a>>:<br><br><p><font color="#500050">On Fri, Feb 4, 2011 at 10:16 AM, Aristid Breitkreuz<br>
<<a href="mailto:aristidb@googlemail.com">aristidb@googlemail.com</a>> wrote:<br>> Writing this ...</font></p>Yes, for functions I don't care what you name things. It's<br>
specifically data constructors that breaks backwards compatibility.<br>
<p><font color="#500050"><br>> Headers are already there, no? You're confusing me.<br></font></p>I was talking about the semi-exhaustive list of headers that people<br>
often request, eg hdrAccept = "Accept", hdrContentType =<br>
"Content-Type", etc. It was brought up in the original thread.<br>
<p><font color="#500050"><br>> Thanks for the nice feedback!<br>><br>> Aristid<br>> "sent from my Android"<br>><br>> Am 04.02.2011 07:09 schrie...</font></p></blockquote></p>