[xmonad] better combineTwoP and Property

Михаил wproxym at gmail.com
Sat Apr 9 00:13:22 CEST 2011


В Fri, 8 Apr 2011 14:46:10 -0700
Konstantin Sobolev <konstantin.sobolev at gmail.com> пишет:

> >
> > Regardless of whether or not the default ComboP should follow this
> > changed behavior, the common code means that one should probably be
> > written in terms of
> > the other.
> >  
> 
> I think I can add one more Bool parameter to combineTwoP telling if
> the whole layout must be replaced by one of the two sub-layouts if
> another sub-layout is empty.

Yes. It's very good idea.

-- 
Best regards, Michael



More information about the xmonad mailing list