[xmonad] thinking of switching...
serialhex at gmail.com
Wed Sep 7 23:01:55 CEST 2011
so, as the title suggests, i'm think ing of switching to xmonad for my wm...
my Q is: how much haskell do i need to know to use it effectively? at the
moment i am pre-alpha grasshopper status in my haskell coding skills, (i
know haskell exists and is high on my list of languages to learn) though i
don't want to have to become a haskell guru in order to be able to use
xmonad. so really, what's the learning curve like to start using xmonad?
my blog is cooler than yours: serialhex.github.com
The wise man said: "Never argue with an idiot. They bring you down to their
level and beat you with experience."
> > Other than the fact Linux has a cool name, could someone explain why I
> > should use Linux over BSD?
> No. That's it. The cool name, that is. We worked very hard on
> creating a name that would appeal to the majority of people, and it
> certainly paid off: thousands of people are using linux just to be able
> to say "OS/2? Hah. I've got Linux. What a cool name". 386BSD made the
> mistake of putting a lot of numbers and weird abbreviations into the
> name, and is scaring away a lot of people just because it sounds too
-- Linus Torvalds' follow-up to a question about Linux
-------------- next part --------------
An HTML attachment was scrubbed...
More information about the xmonad