<br><br><div class="gmail_quote">On 31 March 2012 02:27, Ben Boeckel <span dir="ltr"><<a href="mailto:mathstuf@gmail.com">mathstuf@gmail.com</a>></span> wrote:<br><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
Out of curiosity, what happens if you continually switch between windows<br>
on a single workspace? With the current fade hook, the factor keeps<br>
getting multiplied (switching focus between windows A and B when C<br>
exists makes C fade to nothing after lots of switches).<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>I have never experienced that, an I must say that I got borred after a minute trying to replicate what you mention, without any noticeable effect (Only switching between window A and B, window C didn't get more transparent). I don't see (from a quick look) any way that the code would allow the opacity to change if lots of switches happen.</div>
<div><br></div><div> </div><blockquote class="gmail_quote" style="margin:0 0 0 .8ex;border-left:1px #ccc solid;padding-left:1ex">
If that's fixed, it should probably be ported back to fadeInactive as<br>
well (a different patch if so).<br></blockquote><div><br></div><div>It is implemented the exact same way as fadeInactiveLogHook (using "fadeOutLogHook . fadeIf").</div><div><br></div><div>--</div><div>Reenberg</div>
</div>